|
Court of Appeals Rules Against Napster
From a news story by
CNN San Francisco Reporter Rusty Dornin
February 12, 2000
It wasn't the day the music died, but a death sentence for Napster's
version of free music swapping appears close at hand.
Hank Barry, Napster CEO, remarked on the ruling. "We're disappointed
with this ruling. Under this decision Napster could be shut down, even
before a trial on the merits."
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Napster must police its
more than fifty million users and [to] stop them from sharing copyrighted
material. [Its] a nearly impossible task.
While the appeals court told a lower court to modify its injunction
against Napster, it didn't overturn it. The recording industry called
it a victory for all creators.
Hillary Rosen of the Recording Industry Association of America says,
"A business model built on infringement is not only morally wrong
but legally wrong, and we're very gratified that the Ninth Circuit today
agreed with us 100 percent."
For now, Napster's is up and running, until the lower federal court
modifies the injunction. But some music industry analysts say when it
comes to stopping copyright infringement, [its] too little too
late.
Ric Dube of Webnoize.com, "There are far too many applications
that let people do what Napster does. Most of them are far more difficult
to stop than Napster has been."
Napster says it will continue to provide music; only in the future users
would have to pay a fee for it. Founder Shawn Fanning who recently made
a deal with publishing giant Bertelsmann claims his dream won't end
here. "We've been developing a Napster service that offers additional
benefits to members of the community and importantly makes payments
to artists. I'm focused on building this better service and I hope to
have it in place this year."
But probably [it will] not [happen] before the injunction which could
come within a matter of days or weeks. Napster says it will appeal,
and possibly petition the Supreme Court. Until the order comes to shut
down, millions of fans are likely to continue jamming the site before
Napster is silenced.
Additional Notes:
Further notes and discussion
Shawn Fanning was eighteen when he developed the musical software that
eventually became Napster. At the time, he was a freshman at Northeastern
University in Boston, Massachusetts. Fanning dropped out of college
and moved to Redwood City, California where he founded Napster. His
critics have called him a pirate while his fans hail him as a revolutionary.
In December 1999, the Recording Industry of America sued Napster for
copyright infringement. U.S. District Court Jusge Marilyn Patel ruled
in July 2000 that Napster must rid its site of all copyrighted material.
Then Napster appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In the
meantime, Fanning merged his company with Bertelsmann, a publishing
company, to provide music for a fee. Although Napster did not win the
appeal, the company has vowed to continue the fight.
As a result of the Ninth Circuit Court ruling, Napster has offered to
settle the lawsuit by paying one billion dollars over a period of five
years. The money, if accepted, will go to musicians, songwriters and
record companies. In order for Napster to pay the one billion, users
of the web site will pay $2.95 to $4.95 per month for limited access.
People wanting unlimited access will be charged $5.95 to $9.95 per month.
Below are a few of the many web sites with information on this topic:

© 1999-2001 Cable News Network, Inc.
Western/Pacific Literacy Network
Western/Pacific LINCS
All Rights Reserved
|